Enough Already!

Condoleeza Rice just recently rebutted Bill Clinton's claims on attempting to prevent 9/11 by saying, "What we did in the eight months was at least as aggressive as what the Clinton administration did in the preceding years." She also stated, "The notion somehow for eight months the Bush administration sat there and didn't do that is just flatly false - and I think the 9/11 commission understood that."

Come on, what is this? A pissing match? Enough already! Yeah, Clinton was a bit irked by the ABC mockumentary special on 9/11, which bashed him profusely, so he has fought back. Okay, both sides got some lovely words in, so can we end it there? No, of course not. Round 2 is now underway with Rice throwing some jabs. So, who's next? Put your gloves on and jump into the ring to talk about the hypothetical, the hindsight, the coulda woulda shoulda.

I'm sorry Condi (not really), but Richard Clarke, who is a registered Republican, seems to put more blame on the Bush Administration than the Clinton Administration and the 9/11 Commission did as well. Even in a recent poll I viewed (today), the public seems to blame the Bush Administration more than the Clinton Administration by a 46-39% margin. You don't have to listen to Billy Boy if you don't want to, but listen to the citizens, the Commission, and Richard (not Cheney) and they'll all tell you the same thing. So, if you want to ignore that, feel free to tune into Fox News and I'm sure 96% of the blame will be placed on the Clinton Administration and why? They're "fair and balanced." Yeah, they're about as fair and balanced as a drunk man during a sobriety test.

Link:

http://articles.news.aol.com/news/_a/rice-challenges-clinton-on-his-anti/20060926074209990003